Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 19:44:51 GMT -8
Aconsumer undertakes to repay the total amount of this credit and to pay the interest and costs which he would have been obliged to pay under the national regulation in the absence of said agreement. . The Courts observations The Court notes regarding the first preliminary question that Art. para. letter j of Directive EC must be interpreted in the sense that an agreement to reschedule a credit which is concluded following the nonfulfillment of the payment obligation by a consumer between him and the creditor through a debt recovery agencies is not concluded free of charge within.
The meaning of that provision when by said agreement the consumer Country Email List undertakes to repay the total amount of this credit and to pay interest or costs that were not provided for in the original contract under which the said credit was granted. Regarding the second question the Court notes that Art. letter f and art. of Directive must be interpreted in the sense that a debt recovery agency that concludes on behalf of a creditor an agreement to reschedule an unpaid credit but which does not act as a credit intermediary except in an auxiliary capacity aspect the verification of which is the.
Competence of the referring court must be considered as a credit intermediary within the meaning of this article letter f and is not subject to the precontractual obligation to inform the consumer pursuant to articles and from the said directive. .agency is not subject to the precontractual obligation to inform the consumer and that an agreement to reschedule a credit is not concluded for free when the consumer undertakes to repay the full amount of this credit and to pay interest or costs that were not provided for in the original contract. . Link THE CURIA . Articles of national legislation relevant to.
The meaning of that provision when by said agreement the consumer Country Email List undertakes to repay the total amount of this credit and to pay interest or costs that were not provided for in the original contract under which the said credit was granted. Regarding the second question the Court notes that Art. letter f and art. of Directive must be interpreted in the sense that a debt recovery agency that concludes on behalf of a creditor an agreement to reschedule an unpaid credit but which does not act as a credit intermediary except in an auxiliary capacity aspect the verification of which is the.
Competence of the referring court must be considered as a credit intermediary within the meaning of this article letter f and is not subject to the precontractual obligation to inform the consumer pursuant to articles and from the said directive. .agency is not subject to the precontractual obligation to inform the consumer and that an agreement to reschedule a credit is not concluded for free when the consumer undertakes to repay the full amount of this credit and to pay interest or costs that were not provided for in the original contract. . Link THE CURIA . Articles of national legislation relevant to.